Alexander J. Hadjis 
Fish & Richardson P.C.
601 Thirteenth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20005
Telephone: 202 783-5070
Facsimile: 202 783-2331
email hadjis@fr.com 

Education 
The Ohio State University B.S. Electrical Engineering 1990 
University of Pittsburgh School of Law J.D. 1993 
The George Washington University Law School LL.M. Intellectual Property 1996 

Bar admissions 
Registered to practice before the United States Patent and Trademark Office. 
Admitted to the bar in Virginia, the District of Columbia, and the Federal Circuit.

Professional experience 
Principal of Fish & Richardson P.C. Joined the firm in 2000. Mr. Hadjis's practice focuses on complex litigation, including intellectual property litigation, licensing, and counseling. He has litigated patent infringement and breach of contract cases in several federal district courts and the U.S. International Trade Commission. The cases Mr. Hadjis has litigated cover the semiconductor, telecommunications, software, xerography, chemical, and automotive component fields. Previously, Mr. Hadjis was an associate of Clifford Chance Rogers & Wells LLP and Howrey & Simon. He also served as a law clerk to The Honorable Wilson Cowen of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.  

Litigation examples 
Certain Semiconductor Chips with Minimized Chip Package Size and Products Containing Same (U.S.I.T.C.) (semiconductor packaging case, defending Sharp against patent-based unfair importation claims brought by Tessera, Inc.); Telecom Technical Servs., Inc. v. Siemens Rolm Communications, Inc. (N.D. Ga.) (telecommunications case, defending Siemens against Kodak-based antitrust claims brought by independent service organizations); ASHA Corp. v. Dana Corp. (E.D. Mich.) (automotive component cases, defended patent infringement and breach of contract claims brought by ASHA against Dana); MCI Corp. v. AT&T Am. Transtech, Inc. (E.D. Pa.) (telecommunications case, defended patent infringement claims brought by MCI against American Transtech, AT&T, and Universal Card Services); Xerox Corp. v. Mita Copystar Am. Inc. (W.D.N.Y.) (xerography case, prosecuted patent infringement claims for Xerox against Mita); Certain SDRAMs, DRAMs, ASICs, RAM-and-Logic Chips, Microprocessors, Microcontrollers, Processes for Manufacturing Same, and Products Containing Same (U.S.I.T.C.) (semiconductor circuit case, prosecuted patent-based unfair importation claims for Samsung through a full hearing against Fujitsu); Certain Telephonic Digital Added Main Line Systems, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same (U.S.I.T.C.) (telecommunications case, prosecuted patent-based unfair importation claims for Raychem against ECI Telecom Ltd.).

Other 
Member: American Bar Association, American Intellectual Property Law Association.

JurisNotes.Com - The Law in Brief Copyright ©  JurisNotes.Com